Manhood roles expect men not to have any issues that may need liberation

"So here is the question: are men less masculine, or more liberated? Are they being feminized, or humanized?­"

It's a good question, but unfortunat­ely I don't think the answer is very simple. Men are not becoming more liberated because by and large, no one has thought men have anything that they need to be liberated from. In fact, I think the traditiona­l male role was distinctly defined as not needing help or liberation at all -- it was a failure for a man to need assistance­, for the most part.
-- Minnesota Black (a poster on an internet forum called Huffpost Culture)

Evidence that Christianity removed the gender difference between 'man' and 'third genders' and clubbed them together paving for the invalid concept of 'sexual orientation.'

"... you can see there is a two tiered system of justice. Penetrator homosexuality is fully acceptable, whereas submissive homosexuals suffered persecution for their weakness. Knowing this, how can you describe homosexuality as anything other than predatory?
It is actually the Christian apostle Paul who broke this two tiered system of homosexuality for the future of Western Civilization. He equated all homosexual acts as a violation of the natural use of the body and made no distinction between the dominant or submissive partner in the abominable copulation:

Romans 1:24-27 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.